in which on this occasion the
Emigration officer at Hongkong performed his duties.
Upon dealing with the question I submit that as regards the absence of a surgeon the Emigration Agent has vindicated himself;
but that the conclusions pronounced in that respect are the consequences of his omission to explain the facts;
and that in regard to light and ventilation at hatchways my calculations are erroneous. Due to no fault on my part.
19.
450
I see no reason to modify the opinions expressed in the report of 20 March last.
I have the honour to be,
Your Obedient
Humble servant,
[...]
However, to follow the exact output format as requested (HTML usingfor paragraphs), here is the revised response:
in which on this occasion the
Emigration officer at Hongkong performed his duties.
Upon dealing with the question I submit that as regards the absence of a surgeon the Emigration Agent has vindicated himself;
but that the conclusions pronounced in that respect are the consequences of his omission to explain the facts;
and that in regard to light and ventilation at hatchways my calculations are erroneous. Due to no fault on my part.
19.
450
I see no reason to modify the opinions expressed in the report of 20 March last.
I have the honour to be,
Your Obedient
Humble servant,
Udoch
in which on this occasion the
Emigration officer at Hongkong performed his duties .
Upon deal
theat
question I submich that as
regards
the
apumed aturnce
absence
of a surgeon the Emigration Agent has vindicated himself_
but that the concure pronounced
in that respect consequences of
thie
his
omission texplain the facts_
and that m
regard
ard to light
and ventilation.
=lation
at
hatchways
my
calen =
to the sip of the
other respects
erroneous. Du
eel no Mason
19.
450
to modify the frinions expressed
in the export of 20 March last.
chave the honour to be
Liv
Your Obedient
Humble servant
udoch
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.